07 May 2006

The Big 4: 2nd Amendment; Reproductive Freedom; Marriage Equality & the Death Penalty

The Second Amendment. I only mention this here because it is certainly one of the "big" issues we all face today, but I have made my position clear on many occasions, here in this blog ("From the Gun Safe of the Well-Armed Sheep", 20 April 2006) and on my website. I do support a short waiting period to buy a handgun (say 2 days) because of the growing number of cases where domestic violence ends up with someone being shot. It is simply too easy for someone in a rage to buy a gun and shoot his or her spouse or even their entire family- something which would be much harder with any other weapon. If even one life is saved it is worth the very small inconvenience. I also have no problem with laws that keep guns away from violent offenders. Other than these safety issues the Constitution is clear: the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Reproductive Freedom. First off I disagree with both of the labels people toss about when discussing abortion- "pro-life" and "pro-choice". We are ALL pro-life. In fact, since many people who call themselves "pro-life" are supporters of the death penalty, and many people who are "pro-choice" are against it, I find the whole issue of labels too simplistic. Likewise "pro-choice". Everyone is "pro-choice"- the debate is only as to WHO gets to choose. I also think that we can all agree that we should all do what we can to make abortion unnecessary, and that even so there are some circumstances where it will still be necessary. I have thought about this more than any other single issue since becoming a mother and grandmother, and I remain convinced that the proper person to make the choice is the woman who is facing the decision. She, along with her family, partner, clergy, Doctor or whomever she trusts- MUST be allowed self-determination free of the veto of any politician in Lansing or Washington. So my position is clear- I fully support a woman's right to choose and will put my efforts into providing services and education which will make the choice of having an abortion TRULY the last - and least chosen- alternative. Quite simply we should refrain from making choices for others and focus on offering them BETTER options to choose from.
And I cannot leave this discussion without expressing my utter CONTEMPT for anyone who takes a position in which they would force a woman to have a child against her wishes, justifying their action by referencing their belief in the sanctity of life, while also supporting the death penalty and war. I will discuss the death penalty later but now that we know that there were no weapons of mass destruction, that Iraq WAS NOT involved in the 9/11 attacks and that Saddam Hussein did not support either Al Qaeda OR the Taliban we must accept that under international law (which we helped develop) we were not justified in attacking Iraq. In fact doing so was completely prohibited, amounting to a "war of aggression", and, since innocent civilians have died, "crimes against humanity". On May 4, 2002, the Bush administration formally renounced its obligations as a signatory to the 1998 Rome Statute (which established the International Criminal Court (ICC)). Critics say the decision to "unsign" the treaty will further damage the United States' reputation and isolate it from its allies. It has, however, stalled international efforts to charge President Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and others with "war crimes". see also http://www.iacenter.org/Iraq/iraq_wct-rc.htm

Marriage Equality. ("Same-sex Marriage"). Our country was founded on the separation of church and state. Contrary to what some believe, we are NOT a "Christian Nation" and the founding fathers were not what we would call "Christians". Thomas Jefferson had a habit of "editing" bibles, removing such things as "miracles" being attributed to Jesus . In a letter to James Smith, Jefferson says: "The hocus-pocus phantasm of a God, like another Cerberus, with one body and three heads, had its birth and growth in the blood of thousands and thousands of martyrs" (Works, Vol. iv., p. 360).
When asked, Benjamin Franklin said: "I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies" . [Benjamin Franklin, in Toward The Mystery]
And the word "Equality" is both simple and profound. It is simple in definition and profound in effect. To put it in simplest terms- either we are ALL equal, or none of us are. My position is likewise simple- "Marriage" is a term best suited for religion- and as church should not meddle in state so state should not control the church. Each religion should follow its own beliefs. The LEGAL rights and responsibilities, however, are the realm of the state. No one should be denied basic human rights (the "pursuit of happiness", freedom of association) based on ANYONE else's religious beliefs. I therefore support "civil unions" for both same-sex and opposite sex couples which carry the same legal rights and responsibilities as marriage. I also support the ABSOLUTE right of each religion to its own position in this matter. This does NOT "open the door" for polygamy or other "marriage-like" states. It is a basic tool of law that one should craft a law to meet the narrowest possible solution which actually corrects the given injustice. My position meets that goal- every adult should be able to form a life bond with one other adult. A simple, clear- AMERICAN- rule.

The Death Penalty. I am against the Death Penalty, for 1 main reason. We have executed innocent people, and when we do WE ALL BECOME MURDERERS. While there may be debate as to how many innocent people have been executed, since 1973 more than 115 people have been sentenced to death only to be found innocent later and released from death row. This should give us a clue. In Congress, US Senator Russ Feingold has introduced S. 122, the Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act, and S. 132, the National Death Penalty Moratorium Act, while a national blue ribbon commission reviews the fairness of the administration of the death penalty. Because of problems in its application, the US Supreme Court has twice ruled capital punishment unconstitutional, and twice reversed itself. Clearly "mistakes" have been- and will continue to be, made. There is no real necessity for the death penalty- we are just as safe with the offender in maximum security serving life without parole as we are with him executed, and there is no definitive and reliable evidence that capital punishment has any deterrent effect. Neither does it save money- although this is the most despicable argument that pro-capital punishment people make. The cost of an execution, given the years on death row, necessary appeals and other associated costs is MUCH MORE than the cost of keeping someone in prison for life.
I would also like you to think about the fact that very few countries still have the death penalty- mainly the US and some countries in the Middle East and eastern Europe and east Asia- nearly all of which we have routinely labeled "Human Rights Violators" or a part of some "Axis of Evil". And nearly all of those few countries do not execute children or the mentally handicapped, although- for instance- Governor Bush of Florida and Governor Bush of Texas (now President Bush) have both allowed the execution of people with very low IQ's and of very young age at the time of their offenses. Is this the company we want to be associated with? Is it any wonder that the majority of the world sees us as bloodthirsty and dangerous?
Assume with me that if we worked together we could make absolutely sure that "no parole" meant "no parole". With the "protection of society" assured, can you truly justify the mistaken murder of EVEN ONE innocent person in the name of vengeance? Remember that the Sixth Commandment, "Thou SHALT NOT kill", does not have a footnote nor an exception. Hebrews 10:30 and Romans 12:18-21 come directly from the mouth of God:

18 If it is possible, as much as it is up to you, be at peace with all men.
19 Don't seek revenge yourselves, beloved, but give place to God's wrath. For it is written, "Vengeance belongs to me; I will repay, says the Lord."
20 Therefore If your enemy is hungry, feed him. If he is thirsty, give him a drink; for in doing so, you will heap coals of fire on his head.
21 Don't be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
I sure can't improve on that!

3 Comments:

Blogger peacenik said...

As for the right to bear arms, I disagree. It was the right law at the time it was written. Since the British are no longer about to attack, it should be amended.

I don't care what they say about it's not guns who kill, it's people - or something like that. When there's a gun in the house there is always the danger that, in a fit of rage, it will be used.

Unfortunately, Americans have a gun culture. You see it in the media - television and movies. Very seldom is there a movie where there isn't gunfire, car chases, things blowing up, people dying. Even in comedies. It's digusting.

20/5/06 13:57  
Blogger Liberal Thought in SW Michigan- NOT Dead Yet! said...

It should be- and HAS BEEN- amended. I AM NOT for unfettered rights. The founders would have excluded machine gune, had they knew such things would someday exist. BUT THE RIGHT CANNOT BE DENIED. So what are reasonable and necessary restrictions? Waiting periods hor crimes of passion, background checks for criminals, limits on weapons that only exist to kill on a military level.
Yes, guns KILL PEOPLE, but SO DO KNIVES,ROCKE, ROPES and everything else you can lay a hand on. The only difference is maybe there are more accidental deaths with guns- but far more with cars, booze amd cigarettes. I have had a handgun ON MY BED'S HEADBOARD for 20+ years, and no one has been injured. I take all reasonable precautions. I fear accidents less than a rapist. PERIOD. ANOTHER reasonable restriction- gun safety education or ANYONE in a household where there are guns. My children were taught gun safety at a young age, and they taught the grandchildren. So while we have had deaths from bad diet (heart trouble), smoking, accidents of other kinds and even old age, NO ONE EVER died from accidental firing of a firearm. At least one died from not having one when it was needed, however....

21/5/06 20:25  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://eekshop.com
Free iPod for more information about Computer Transfer: Floola

2/6/13 21:26  

Post a Comment

<< Home